See Also: UQS RE:"Quantum Many Body System"~ FQXi: D. Oriti 11/2021 ... 22/03/18
UQS CONSCIOUSNESS INVESTIGATION: the Crystallography of the "Universal" Consciousness
See Also: UQS Re: "WHY GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE"~ VERITASIUM 10/9/2020... 21/08/08
See Also: UQS Re:"THIS IS MATH'S FATAL FLAW"~ VERITASIUM 2021... 21/08/08
See Also: FQXi Essay:Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability... 20/04/09
See Also: Space-Time Energy As Substance Underlies All Space-Time Energy Phenomena... 19/11/15
See Also: FQXi Essay: What is Fundamental?... 18/01/03
See Also: UQS Analysis: Nassim Haramein... 16/12/05
See Also: UQS Re: Tommaso Bolognesi ... 16/09/16
See Also: UQS Social Media and Forums ... 16/09/16; UPDATE: 18/05/25; UPDATE: 20/05/29; UPDATE: 21/05/01; UPDATE: 21/06/04; UPDATE: 21/06/20; UPDATE: 21/09/03; UPDATE: 22/03/24; UPDATE: 22/05/12; UPDATE: 22/06/18; UPDATE: 22/07/26; UPDATE: 22/08/18; 22/12/05
See Also: UQS Data Bus ... 15/04/09
See Also: UQS Analysis: Wave-Particle Duality ... 14/04/01
See Also: UQS Analysis: S. Lloyd; arxiv.org/abs/1310.3225 ... 13/11/17
See Also: UQS Analysis: Vamivakas/Neukirch Laser Exp. ... 13/08/29
See Also: UQS Analysis: S. Lloyd SCIAM Q-computers ... 13/07/28
See Also: UQS Analysis: OPERA Neutrino ... 11/09/29
Update: 202012/17... Edit punctuation, minor sentence structure, and correction of quanta (plural)/quantum (singular) errors
INDEX: (to page hot links)
"Universal" Consciousness/Computational Geometry:
"Our Own" Consciousness/Computational Geometry:
- SELECTED HISTORICAL COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY INVESTIGATIONS:
Vedic Sanskrit "Subtle Body":
DNA "Double Helix":
Particle Accelerator Events "CST Model":
Cosmological "Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe":
UQS "Origin Singularity Quantization":
- UQS OVERLAY OF SELECTED HISTORICAL COMPUTAIONAL GEOMETRY INVESTIGATIONS:
UQS "Subtle Body":
UQS "Double Helix":
UQS "CST Proton Model":
UQS "Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe":
UQS "QE/QI Emission CAD/SIM":
- APPLICATION TO REALITY:
"Does this mean that understanding all the properties of our region of the universe will require, besides a knowledge of Physics, a deep
understanding of our own nature, perhaps even including the nature of our consciousness?" ~ Andrei Linde
As defined by Source, Switch, and Data Bus... Ref: UQS Data Bus
The current data processing configuration of all components of an information system.
Any perception of a differential produces data, for processing by an information system.
Reduction in the scale of perceivable differential, alters options for data processing.
Challenge to functionality drives evolution of one's individual perceptions, and like the current electronic digital devise application boom,
potential for advanced human functionality, provides impetus for investigation of one's installed data processing structure.
As the Data Bus component of an information system... Ref: UQS Data Bus
... consciousness is associated with a Source, and Switch, and infers the ability to resolve a 2-bit differential as Energy/Space event data.
All after is expanded consciousness... i.e. subsequent streamed sequence of events which can be given temporal order... next, next, next.
A consciousness investigation suggest a need to resolve a model of consciousness, as a computational geometry, that can be verified by successful
application of the mechanix derived from the computational geometry, to physical reality.
Therefor, computational geometry should be specific to physical reality... i.e. transport of energy within a 3 dimensional geometry.
"Universal" Consciousness/Computational Geometry:
An Energy/Space/Time data processor... i.e. Source, Switch, and Data Bus... Ref: UQS Data Bus
... that can sequentially process an absolute minimum differential... i.e. indivisiible quantum of data.
To resolve an underlying quantum computational geometry, which gives context to a minimum perception of differential... i.e. resolves a minimum quantum of Energy
(QE) occupancy, at any minimum quantum of space (QI) address, requires a valid unified field matrix/geometry.
"It is unlikely that there will be more than one such correct model." ~ E.Fredkin
"Our Own" Consciousness/Computational Geometry:
Does this assume a sub-processor of the "Universal" Consciousness?
If so. and one assumes the initial sub-processor quantization was consistent with the "Universal" quantization, then an investigation to
expand application of quantum functionality/mechanix to reality, will require a valid unified field geometry... i.e. resolve of "Universal" computational
geometry... and application of causal set criteria... i.e. mapping pulsed or single event Energy emission and subsequent distribution
within the quantization geometry.
It has been observed that sub-processors can imprint scaled path dictates... i.e. establish hierarchal preference in sub-processor's decision making...
that may obscure functionality of the underlying information system components of the sub-processor.
The "Universal" quantization scale underlying the sub-processor information system, may be imprinted by intent internal or external to the sub-processor, and
to implement/restore successful application of quantum functionality/mechanix to reality, may not only require a valid unified "Universal" model, but also a
history/memory of modifications made by the sub-processo, or it's environ.
Any Intermittent Calculation State (ICS) request by the processor... Ref: UQS Data Bus
... accesses current state of the energy field choreography and intent.
Pulse-One-Open ICS implies a default logic to resolve input of QE within the computational geometry, but no bias for the outcome of the ICS.
In the case of a pulsed quantum "Universal" Consciousness, we can initially set Pulse-One-Open default intent for ICS outcome, as "the expansion of energy equally in
all directions"... Ref: UQS Emission CAD/SIM Pulse-One-Open Default
Pulse-One-Close, logs a bias data base of successful ICS solution, and derived mechanix, which can be utilized by the Pulse-Two-Open ICS to resolve "next".
The logged bias data base, of successful ICS solutions and derived mechanix, influences outcome of subsequent ICS.
That is to say that intent, was necessitated by resolve of initial ICS, and it can be inferred that any subsequent ICS resolve, will expand intent.
This suggest that A. Linde's discussion of quantum fluctuations associated with expansion of spatial geometrization, may also apply to quantum fluctuations
associated with ICS sequencing.
In the case of "Our Own Consciousness", we can observe many orders of intent for outcome... i.e. influences on ICS reslove.
Although UQS CAD/SIM emissions have solved out to 75 pulses, with a lab/game default setting of: Single ICS Solution
... the eventuality of a requirement for more than one solution to the ICS, would necessitate expansion of initial default logic.
- SELECTED HISTORICAL COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY INVESTIGATIONS:
Historically, the scale reduction of Energy Choreography, as a data process within a computational geometry, can yield, either graphically or conceptually, an
evolved visualization of functionality... i.e. advanced options for data processing Energy/Space relationships... from which to derive advanced Energy/Space
A quantized CAD data field, in which query of an addressable minimum quantum of Space (QI), facilitates minimum quanta of Energy (QE) occupation status,
is a virtual Quantum Energy Mechanix lab... i.e. supports graphical perception of absolute minimum differential... in which basic data processing
operations...i.e. compare, replace, etc.... can be applied.
In the last 200 years, the development of motion visualization tools have facilitated a temporal component... i.e. Energy/Space/Time relationship SIM models...
in which the differentiation of Space can be theorized to generate the initial 2-bits at the root of a spatially expanding "Universal" Quantum Energy Data Bus.
The closer the visualization corresponds to the installed "Universal" computational geometry... i.e. Energy/Space/Time data structure... the more effectively, derived/
supported functions apply to reality. Ref: previous UQS discussions of Cartesian and Radian computational geometries.
We will herein consider 5 significant computational models, either as geometry, or as conceptual mathematics, in order of development, that have yielded
recorded visualizations of Energy Choreography.
1. The Vedic Sanskrit "Subtle Body"... 12,000 BC... as an investigation of the human body as an Energy/Information processor.
2. The DNA "Double Helix" Molecule... Crick/Watson/Wilkins... 1952... as an investigation of the Mass entity data structures utilized as components of human
3. The Particle Accelerator Events "CST Proton Model"... A. Barzydlo... 2000.... investigates internal Energy choreography and collision mechanix of perturbative
Energy entities within the "Universal" field.
4. The Cosmological "Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe"... Andrei Linde... 2000... investigates a geometry link between pertrubative entities of the "Standard Model"
and a causal computational geometry of a "Universal" information processor.
5. The UQS "Origin Singularity Quantization"... 2000... investigates initial unified volumetric unit quantization required for equal Energy distribution in all directions from a single point,
and resolve of a pulsed QE/QI emission, dictated by the computational geometry of the quantization .
1.The Sanskrit "Subtle Body":
This model "describes a subtle physiology having a number of focal points (chakras, acupuncture points) connected by a series of channels (nadis, Acupuncture meridians)
that convey breath (prana, vayu, ch'i, ki, lung)", and facilitates investigation of Energy Choreography as information processed by a 2D data bus
visualization of causal computational geometry within the human entity/body....i.e. the human entity as an information sub-processor.
Flow of minimum Energy quanta (QE) within minimum Spatial quanta (QI) are conceptually supported by various text associated with the model over time.
SOURCE: Graphical visualization of "point of contact" to the "Universal" processor and it's source, equates as freely available "Universal" Energy
for application by the "Subtle Body" sub-processor, and suggest a continuous pulsed emission rather than an emission in which all the Energy in the Universe, was dispensed in one big bang.
SWITCH: Graphical visualization of lotus petals as quanta of Spatial Energy containment (QI), resembles a 2D icon of the 3D UQS Address Pair (AP).
DATA BUS: Graphical visualization of spatially defined Energy channels (path dictates) and connectivity, mapped to the human body, provide a 2D tree
computational geometry model, from which to derive functions.
Note that the "Subtle Body" geometry is not a perfect 3D unified field matrix, but the "Jewel in the Lotus" can be visualized as a 2D icon of the UQS 3D Origin Singularity (OS).
Application to reality was, and is still being developed, utilizing the model.
In that the model has survived more than 12K years, may be attributed to the availability of the data being investigated, i.e. the human body.
That is to say that particle accelerators are not so readily available to everyone, as is one's body.
2. The DNA "Double Helix":
This model investigates Mass entity data structures... i.e. scaled Energy choreographies... that can be differentiated at the data bus pulse rate resolution (frequency),
being utilized by the human body Energy processor, for application of mechanix/functions associated with genetic data.
The "Double Helix" provides spatial address correlation to Mass scale Energy entities, but the model makes no attempt to define a minimum unit of Energy (QE),
or a minimum Spatial address (QI) of QE... i.e. a computational geometry imprinted by differential perception limitations of the sub-processor may obscure an
underlying "Universal" computational geometry.
The "Double Helix" crystallography, exposes the connection between Hydrogen bonds and the DNA ph behavioral changes, identifies cross ratio of paired
purines and pyrimidine as a key in species type, and resolves a replication mechanism that supports both variant and complementary functions.
SOURCE: The lack of graphical and/or conceptual link to "Universal" processor and/or it's source, and the conceptual necessity for a dependency on external
biological/Mass Energy entity sources, infers unverifiable link to the "Universal" information processor source... i.e. with regard to a sub-processor of the
"Universal" this is a perturbative Energy source model.
SWITCH: Graphical visualization of rotated 2D splines and planes, as the spatial icons for energy transfers, facilitate constrained 3D node transport
options... i.e. does not utilize the extended transport options of a 3D volume base unit.
DATA BUS: Graphical visualization of spatially defined Mass entities, mapped as 2 helix chains wound around a common axis... i.e. an energy channel and
connections... allows investigation of the data bus connectivity options currently identified as being utilized by DNA applications, but offers no exploration of
genetic function connectivity facilitated by a data bus quantized by a valid 3D unified computational geometry.
3. The Particle Accelerator Events "CST Proton Model":
Corpuscular String Theory (CST) is an investigation of perturbative Energy entities and events, as geometries, in an attempt to determine the
underlying connectivity... i.e. Energy path dictates... that correspond to observed entity behavior.
There is no minimum unit of Energy (QE) or minimum unit of Spatial containment (QI) of Energy specified, and no congruent computational geometry...
i.e. no resolve of a "Universal" computational geometry/quantization connectivity between entities.
SOURCE: The model is not linked to an Energy source, and/or, it's associated data processing sequence... i.e. this model is a perturbative Energy source
SWITCH: Graphical visualization of mathematical relationships, conceptualized from particle accelerator scatter screen data, have not resolved a singular
DATA BUS: Graphical visualization of spatially defined conceptual mathematics is restricted by inability to differentiate Energy as a Mass entity, from
Energy as a Mass event/interaction... i.e. channels and connectivity required for information system data bus are un-verifiable.
4. Andrei Linde's "Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe":
This model investigates initial conditions of an Energy/Space/Time computational geometry that would inflate to facilitate observed perturbative entity interactions,
but without defining a minimum unit of Energy (QE) and a minimum unit of Spatial containment (QI) of that Energy, no connectivity to "Universal" Source or Switch,
can be computationally visualized...i.e. perturbation is still an issue.
It does however advance Alan H. Guth and Paul J. Steinhardt's speculation "... that the entire universe evolved from literally nothing." ,
and by suggesting the possibility of a continuous emission, supports readily available QE, as opposed to a singular emission event, which would induce
escalating competition between Energy applications as the system expanded.
SOURCE: Conceptual mathematical Energy relationships are being restricted by lack of QE/QI addressing abilities.. i.e. no computational visualization
available at resolution required to resolve source... i.e. Origin Singularity geometry.
SWITCH: No computational mechanism for minimum Energy quanta (QE), and minimum Spatial quanta (QI), inhibits any graphical quanta transport mechanism verification.
DATA BUS: Graphical visualization of large scale channels and connectivity yield entity development closely resembling UQS unifed field emission entity development,
but the spatial Boolean map is not verifiably quantizable by a uniform base unit volume... i.e. the data bus would essentially be a constrained 3D bubble tree
structure that does not take advantage of the connectivity of a unified 3D volume base unit quantization.
5. The UQS "Origin Singularity Quantization":
"No inference can be made from undifferentiated space/time." ~ s.lingo
The Unified Quantization of Singularity (UQS) model investigates initial "Universal" quantization... i.e. an Origin Singularity causal computational geometry.... required for equal Energy distribution, as pulsed
emissions, of a constant finite quanta of Energy, from a single point, in all directions... Ref: UQS Upon Differentiation
This inherent function requirement, dictated further reduction criteria...i.e. a unified volumetric unit of quantization is required to quantize a spherical
singularity that supports equal distribution in all directions.
The UQS CAD environment supports an Energy/Space relationship... i.e. QE/QI... that expands as spherical shells of 3D unified base unit radii, within a valid
unified field geometry, and resolves the consciousness investigation as the ability to process an Energy quanta differential in a minimum Spatial unit (QI)...
i.e. a verifiable reality.
SOURCE: CAD/SIM visualization of computational geometry utilized by the "Universal" processor from it's source, provides non-perturbative model,
and verifies continuous emission... i.e. freely available Universal Energy (QE) for application by all sub-processes.
Ref: UQS Data Bus
SWITCH: Graphical and conceptual visualization of minimum Energy quanta (QE) and minimum Spatial quanta (QI), facilitates quanta transport mechanism that
utilizes the extended transport options of a unified 3D volumetric base unit.
Ref: UQS Data Bus
DATA BUS: CAD/SIM visualization of a pulsed emission and subsequent distribution of QE/QI, by a channel and connectivity network, quantized by a unified volumetric unit
computational geometry/coordinate system, that underlies the data bus of all sub-process entities,. verifies spatial Boolean map between all entities, and
defines/dictates connectivity and Energy transfer mechanix, between any two or more sub-process entities... i.e. the "Universal Network".
That is to say that the "Universal" consciousness develops as the graphic form of the UQS computational geometry, which verifies a logic 3D unified field theory,
to facilitate the channels and connectivity required for the information system's data bus, which underlies all subsequent entities and mechanix.
Ref: UQS Data Bus
- UQS UNDERLAY OF SELECTED HISTORICAL COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY INVESTIGATIONS:
1. UQS Underlay of Sanskrit "Subtle Body":
Although Sanskrit text verifies that the "Subtle Body" was perceived as a 3D Energy/Information processor, historically, Sanskrit "Subtle
Body" illustrations were done as sand paintings, which necessitated visualization of 3D concepts in 2D, not to mention a great deal
UQS facilitates investigation of "Subtle Body" 3D concepts, as an Energy network within a uniformly quantized volume. In that the
UQS Base Unit (BU) of quantization extends beyond the body... i.e. is "Universal"... a "point of contact" to the "Universal" processor
and it's source is inferred.
2.UQS Underlay of "Double Helix":
Theoretical models can extend visual perception, but validity of data thus obtained is based on the validity of the
computational geometry upon which the theoretical model is based, and the appropriateness of it's application to a visual perception.
The UQS computational geometry facilitates a theoretical perception of an Energy network that can support mechanix/functions not apparent
to current visual verification, and unifies any perturbative entity with a "Universal" network... i.e. certifies "Universal Network
3. UQS Underlay of "CST Proton":
"I just guessed at their lengths when I created the models pictured on this web site." ~ Ref: A. Barzydlo
In that the length of the Sinusoidal String is NOT a measured property, the relative size and position of entities can not be established within any computational
geometry, but by utilizing UQS, the possible paths between any two observed Energy interaction events, can be geometrized as "QE/QI jaggies" within the background
The right portion of the illustration, depicts a minimum distance between Quarks, and a minimum length Sinusoidal Hadron... i.e. string amplitude = 0. Such spatial
constraints restrict visualization... i.e. the UQS Address Pair (AP) planar jaggies are not colored in.
The left portion of the illustration depicts a one Shell... i.e. 1 BU radii... increase in Quark separation, and an arbitrary increase in Sinusoidal Hadron string
amplitude, to provide spatial expansion required for visualization of the UQS Address Pair planar jaggies.
The CST Quark entities... i.e. observed Energy interaction events... resolve as QE Distribution Switches in the QE/QI choreography hierarchy that defines entities.
Non-Mass QE/QI data may network at quantization scales of a smaller size than do Mass entities, and one can NOT assume the quantization of entities illustrated is
equivalent to the Origin Emission quantization... i.e. minimum QI spatial containment.
It can be shown that any Energy form/structure can be resolved as "QE/QI jaggies" at Origin Emission quantization resolution... i.e. minimum background quantization
... and therefor the Equatorial Hadron string and the Pinned Vector Boson string can also be resolved as UQS "QE/QI jaggies".
4. UQS Underlay of "Self-Replicating Inflationary Model":
In that Andre Linde's model does not specify the geometry of the Origin Singularity, any subsequent hierarchal Energy form/structure can NOT be networked to
an Origin Emission Pulse.
If we specify minimum Quantum Energy (QE), and minimum Quantum Space (QI), we can utilize the UQS unified field background quantization embedded in
Space by Pulsed Emission of Energy distributed equally in all directions from the Origin Singularity, as Energy-Data path dictates/options, and all subsequent
Energy form/structure can be resolved as "QE/QI jaggies" within the background quantization.
That is to say that hierarchal entities are identifiable only as a consequence of Energy choreography within the computational geometry...i.e. the QI
structure is a fixed unified field and any observable differential is QE choreography specific... and that choreography is Origin Singularity geometry specific.
5. UQS Underlay of "Origin Singularity QE/QI Emission":
UQS assumes that investigation of the Universe as a choreographed Energy Emission that can be CAD/SIM mapped, must "boot" from differentiation of the
space that quantizes the Energy of the differentiation... i.e. the differentiation of Space generates the initial 2-bits at the root of the "Universal" Quantum Energy
Data Bus... and with only 2-bits to generate subsequent expansion of the data field, a pulsed emission of a constant finite quanta of Energy is inferred... i.e. accumulation
of QE/QI is required to generate the subsequent differentials required to expand the Information System.
The UQS model networks pulsed QE Emission from point of Origin, on two embedded Address Pair (AP) channels... i.e. an Inertia Channel and a Radiation Channel.
The theoretically possible expansion/distribution of QE is dictated by the defaults and user/player settings in the UQS CAD/SIM Lab/Game Ref: UQS Lab/Game Screen
The left portion of the illustration depicts the Pulse-Four-Open condition (P-4-O), which is in tension... i.e. greater than 1 QE/QI... and
if specified by user/player must "Pop" on pulse close.
The right portion of the above illustration depicts the Pulse-Four-Close (P-4-C) ICS solution under specific user/player setting... i.e. in this case Transverse Axis (TA)
Gate setting: OPEN... and QE transits/migrates from Origin Singularity (OS) Address Pairs (AP) to the Shell One Radiation Channel QI Address Pairs (AP).
The UQS Lab/Game is being developed to resolve "Universal" network expansion, past and future, as a consequence of "Universal Consciousness"... i.e. on the basis
of ICS solution dependent options.
- APPLICATION TO REALITY:
Any theory/model must be supported by experiment and application of derived mechanix to reality... or revised.
"... a well defined model... should make it easier to devise crucial experiments."...~ Francis H. C. Crick  co-development of "Double Helix"
In that I do not have a particle accelerator, and/or, access to extensive scatter screen visual data, and my biological lab is not visual DNA resolve equipped,
I am utilizing the "Subtle Body", to make application of the UQS computational geometry and derived mehanix, to reality.
The scale of the data entity processed by any application, may constrain the functionality/mechanix of the application... i.e. applications that process Mass scale
differential data entities are constrained to classical physical properties.
My 1968 Webster New World Dictionary 2cnd. edition, defines Psychic, as "sensitive to forces other than physical", and our minds do process data at sub-Mass
scale resolution... i.e. thought processes.
In regard to the practice of Tumo Yoga... i.e. psychic body heating... the existence of applications that process sub-Mass scale differential data entities...
i.e. psychic apps.... are supported by "Subtle Body" disciplines.
As with any long held model, it was first necessary to strip doctrine/dogma from the application help files, and installing a visualization of a computational
geometry on the physical entity... i.e. "the whole-I spirit must descend". ~ B.T. Spalding , took some practice.
It should be noted that although psychic applications can be verified, any given function request may auto default to previously biased application,... i.e.
the willful newborn who consciously kicked the blanket off while sleeping, was repeatedly overridden by parental discretion.
That is to say that conscious choice, to allow alternative data process response, takes physical and mental discipline.
However, given the concept of freely available sub-Mass scale Energy, and the option of a psychic application to manipulate that Energy within an addressable
spatial containment, I was able to utilize the UQS matrix and associated mechanicx, to conceptualize data bus connectivity that facilitates Tumo Yoga, and
within 3 days, was able to self-heat and sleep/dream comfortably at 54 Fdegs.
Note that Millirepa's cave was, as are most caves, approximately 54 Fdegs.
In the subsequent 6 weeks I was able to maintain comfortable galvanic shell/envelope temperature at 46 Fdegs. In the interim 6 months, symptoms that may
be attributable to 66 years conditioning inflexibility of my circulatory and digestive system circuits, but can not be isolated from the Tumo experiment,
have forced me to proceed with caution.
Given the concept of energy as data, standard data process functions... i.e. compare, copy, replace, delete, etc.... can be applied, and the critical
experiments deal with the potential for sub-Mass scale applications to process Mass scale data entities.
I have successfully applied data polarity transport to re-align the ulnar nerve in my right arm, and symmetry radiation to control a dime size tumor on my left
These and other group experiments suggest psychic apps. are not constrained to quantum properties... i.e. utilization of psychic apps. to effect classical physical
properties is verifiable.
Application design for any logic processor, including the mind, is based on one's understanding of the processor's underlying computational geometry.
In that "Universal" computational geometry is derived specific to an Origin Singularity geometry, which dictates subsequent Energy Emission, one's Origin Singularity
geometry and Universal Emission Myth are critical to verifying mechanix/functions applicable to reality.
If one's own consciousness is a data process, a valid model of the associated computational geometry, and verification of the Energy source that lies at the root of
the process, is essential to determine Switch and Data Bus components, and subsequently, access to installed, and development of, application options.
The Energy choreography of the Hydrogen proton, which I have repeatedly insisted is pre-requisite knowledge for development of the Star Trek Replicator, apparently
teeters on the border between a Mass scale and a sub-Mass scale data entity.
However, if sub-Mass scale applications... i.e. psychic apps.... are not constrained to quantum properties... i.e. can process Mass data entities as composite
sub-Mass scale entities, perhaps the Star Trek Replicator is an application option of the human information processor, available to those who evolve
the mental and physical discipline required to develop and utilize the application's functionality?
1. A. Linde; 'The Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe'... Scientific American Book of the Cosmos; Copyright 2000
Byron Press USBN 0-312-25453-9... pg. 393
2. E.Fredkin; 'Five Big Questions With Pretty Simple Answers'... IBM Journal Res. & Dev., Vol. 48, No. 1, Jan. 2004.
3.Tommaso Bolognesi; 'Causal Sets From Simple Models of Computation'... Ref: arxiv/papers/1004/1004.3128
4. Ref: Wikipedia; Sanskrit Vedic Subtle Body
5. Francis H. C. Crick; 'The Structure of Hereditary Material'... Scientific American Book of the Cosmos; Copyright 2000
Byron Press USBN 0-312-25453-9... pg. 257
6. A. Barzydlo; 'Colliding Corpuscular String Theory (CST)'... Ref: CST Home
Ref: CST Website
7. Alan H. Guth and Paul J. Steinhardt; 'The Inflationary Universe'... Scientific American Book of the Cosmos; Copyright 2000
Byron Press USBN 0-312-25453-9... pg.361
8. B. T. Spalding; 'Life and Teaching of the Masters of the Far East Vol. 1'... DeVoss & Co. Publishing; Copyright 1924/1964 USBN 0-87516-363-7... pg. 23
UQS Logician/Author/Illustrator/Digital Code
UQS Virtual Labs
UQS Web Home
This Post Archived